Chrysler 200 Born from Sebring’s Ashes

2011 Chrysler 200

2011 Chrysler 200

The Chrysler Sebring has to be one of the most widely panned vehicles of all time. It’s not that there was anything particularly bad about it, there just wasn’t anything all that great about it, either. The interior quality was disappointing with lots of hard plastic, the seats were only marginally comfortable, the exterior styling was, well, specific to a Sebring, and the engine was loud and not particularly efficient.

If there was a car that embodied the concept of mediocrity, the Sebring was it.

So how does an automaker get out from underneath a dark cloud like that? Simple, in theory: Build the car with some new materials and new engines and give it a new name. In this case, the result is the Chrysler 200. But are the changes enough?

2011 Chrysler 200 rearChrysler needs the 200 to be something of a revolution, in the same way Chevy needs the Volt to not crash and burn on the sales floor. I remain unconvinced either car will achieve savior status, but at the very least the 200 is a step in the right direction.

Style-wise, there are definite clues as to the Sebring’s heritage, but overall it’s a much cleaned-up look. The 200 features fresh front and rear fascias, LED lighting, and new wheels, but I can’t help but see major Hyundai influence in the front grille and a little Jaguar XF in the rear. I find it curious that Chrysler didn’t release a proper profile shot, leaving me to wonder if nothing was done about the Sebring’s awkwardly angled roofline and greenhouse.

About the inside, Autoweek says,

Interior materials will be upgraded with a new instrument panel, bezels and gauge faces. It will feature upgraded seats with a new design that are softer and more comfortable. The armrests and dash will be soft-touch, and redesigned heating and cooling outlets are fitted in the instrument panel.

Under the hood, buyers will have a choice between a 2.4-liter four-cylinder mated to either a four-speed or six-speed automatic (depending on trim level) or the company’s excellent 3.6-liter Pentastar V6 engine. Specific power outputs and fuel economy numbers haven’t been released yet.

It all sounds pretty good, especially the new engines, but will buyers accept the 200 as an all-new car (which it isn’t), or see it as a nicely dressed-up revision of the Sebring (which it is)?

-tgriffith

Find Used Cars in Your Area at CarGurus

Used Chrysler Sebring
Used Jaguar XF

6 Comments

  1. Styling looks as said “on the right direction.” Now the hope goes on for its overall quality with the big help
    from the FIAT guys for the ride (mostly suspension) and body fit including the noise control. I’ve been
    renting the Fords and other American cars at the airport every time I had to be there and I know almost all of
    them. And sometimes the rental car companies run out of the usual ones and then I could drive, say a
    Camry or an Accord. Then the completely different world was there.

    Better ride, lesser or almost no noise, no comparison mileage, better for almost everything. Every time I tried to enjoy the big curve freeway entrance way was a challenge with the Fords, Chryslers and Chevies and or Buick but Camry and Accord were enjoyable. I felt this is what supposed to be it.

    Now Hyundai has gotten away better. So the key is how deep FIAT guys could step in and help ? Remember, the Chrysler’s better cars were based on the Mercedes platform and not theirs. Crossfire was
    good. Sure it was based on the SLK chassis, right ?

  2. The lack of real engine specs and a profile view sound suspicious – I’d guess Chrysler’s very worried about the 200’s reception. Of course, they were happy with the Sebring for 15 years.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Website