Consumer Reports Disses the Honda Civic

Civic: Still recommended by some of us

When you hear the words “Consumer Reports,” what comes to mind?

Integrity? Protection? Auto recommendations?

All valid, but two words that I’m beginning to associate with the famous publication are “superiority” and “complex.”

Consumer Reports is famous for making influential recommendations on what cars the public should purchase, and when a car falls off that list of recommendations, you can often expect big changes from the manufacturer.

For example, when CR testing revealed that the stability control on the 2010 Lexus GX failed to reign in crazy slides, thereby creating risk for a potential roll-over, the big SUV was placed on the magazine’s Do Not Buy list. That’s not good for business, and the testing resulted in an immediate internal investigation at Toyota that quickly produced a software fix that lifted the GX from its temporary time-out on the blacklist.

In that case, it was a good catch by CR with a good result. But is having so much power a good thing?

The Honda Civic has been CR’s highest-rated small vehicle for quite some time, but the publication will no longer recommend it. Not because of a potentially unsafe problem or a defect in workmanship, but because electronic stability control (ESC) is available only in uplevel EX-L, Si, and Hybrid trims.

Pretty lousy reason, if you ask me.

CR says,

That means the cheapest Civic with stability control has a sticker price of $22,705—significantly higher than the typical small sedan price in our Ratings of about $19,000. And those sedans don’t force you to buy an expensive options package to get stability control; it’s standard on almost every small sedan for 2011. For that matter, it’s standard on many less expensive subcompact cars, including the Ford FiestaMazda2, and Toyota Yaris.

I like Consumer Reports, but I have to call it out here for a bad decision. The Civic is still tops in reliability and resale. It’s an extremely solid, safe car with a legendary reputation. A lack of ESC certainly doesn’t take any of that away and is absolutely not a reason to stop recommending the car. People buy Civics because they run forever, not for the stability control.

Maybe next the Kia Optima won’t be recommended because it isn’t available with AWD and the Mazda3 will lose its recommendation because base versions don’t come with leather seats.

Should Consumer Reports base its recommendations on available options or the quality and reliability of a car?

-tgriffith

Find Used Cars in Your Area at CarGurus

Used Lexus GX
Used Honda Civic
Used Toyota Yaris
Used Kia Optima
Used Mazda3

3 Comments

  1. It’s a great car, but unfortunately like the Accord, you have to pay heavily for upgraded models. Unsatisfactory road noise is a Honda trademark as well.

  2. The quality and reliability of the car is much more important than available options on different trim levels. If the quality of car x with the base trim line is good, then the quality of car x with an uplevel trim is just as good as – if not better than – the base trim because of various options (such as a stronger engine or better suspension system. Or in the Civic’s case – ESC). Is ESC a good feature that I (and most everyone else) would want? Yes. Is not having it on a lower-end Civic bad enough for CR to knock it off its list of recommended cars? No. The car still drives just as well, you just have to be more careful when it rains or snows

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Website