Debt continues to increase while wages lag, and many Americans struggle to purchase a new car. In fact, affordability represents the most severe headwind causing the decline in vehicle sales, which are down 2.0% calendar year to date (CYTD) 2019.
A recent survey from Bankrate finds that 58% of Millennials and 56% of all Americans lose sleep over money troubles. Today, 40% of Millennials earn at least half their income from a side hustle. Millennials are the largest living adult generation as of 2019, and they represent a key demographic in the success of the new and certified pre-owned (CPO) vehicle market. However, an increasing number of Millennials indicate that cost pushes them away from purchasing a new vehicle. Knowing this, increasing Millennial disposable income would lead to a rise in the new-vehicle market.
For Millennials, student loans represent the primary reason for their low disposable income. An estimated 44.7 million people in the U.S. have student debt, which amounts to 1 in 4 Americans. With the estimated student debt at $1.49 trillion and the average monthly payment at $393, the increasing amount of student debt shapes affordability significantly more than wages, housing costs, and the rising price of vehicles.
During the Democratic debates for the 2020 election, many candidates emphasized their policies on student loans. The most recent proposal came from Senator Bernie Sanders, who introduced a bill to cancel all of the roughly $1.5 trillion of student debt. According to Senator Sanders’ fact sheet, the bill would save the average student loan borrower $3,000 a year in student loans, which would provide an economic boost of nearly $1 trillion over ten years.
Putting aside the other potential implications of student debt forgiveness, consider what this kind of stimulus could mean for the auto industry. Student debt remains one of the largest economic struggles for Millennials and other generations. Therefore, loan forgiveness could result in one of the greatest economic stimulus packages in the history of the United States. A stimulus program of this magnitude would create an economic windfall that would boost a number of sectors in the economy, including both automotive and housing.
The Impact on Automotive
The average MSRP of all vehicles continues to rise more quickly than wages. This heightens the struggles of affordability in the automotive industry. Over the past six years, the average MSRP of vehicles increased nearly $7,000, the average lease payment approached $500 per month, and the average finance payment fell above $550 per month. Student loan forgiveness would result in more than 44 million people receiving an additional $393 per month. This would decrease the affordability headwind and create a spark in new-vehicle and CPO sales.
In the short term, the impact would come from consumers entering the market either at the end of their lease or because they are in need of a new vehicle. With an additional $393 per month in their budget, consumers entering or reentering the market would have more vehicles to choose from with this added discretionary income.
Longer term, the market would see a potential increase in new entrants. Currently, there are consumers who stay out of the CPO and new-vehicle markets due to affordability. With student loan forgiveness, those 44 million consumers would be able to pay down debt and save for a down payment, and they could possibly enter the new-vehicle or CPO market for the first time.
Increases in Housing Help the Automotive Industry
If the result of student debt forgiveness increased home purchases, that would also help drive automotive sales. New-home construction and home remodeling have historically positively correlated to automotive sales, specifically in the truck market. As contractors take on more remodeling work and bid on construction projects, they could hire more workers and build their businesses, which would positively impact the truck market.
Conclusion
Student loan forgiveness would give consumers additional monthly income to purchase a vehicle, leaving the most immediate impact in the new vehicle and CPO market. An additional $393 per month would put many consumers into a new class of vehicle, potentially moving them from non-luxury to luxury. Even if consumers spent only a portion of that $393 on a vehicle, an additional $100 would allow consumers to combat the rising cost of new vehicles.
In the midterm, an increase in home ownership would trickle down to the vehicle market. The impact would not immediately affect new-vehicle sales in the first six months, but strengthening the home-construction industry would provide sustained growth in the automotive market over time, providing long-term stability. The result could be the greatest stimulus package in the history of the United States, and it would likely cause a new sales peak in the United States automotive industry.
The “research” in the article states the latest proposal from Senator Sanders in his Presidential run to “cancel” all of the approx. $1.5 TRILLION of student loan debt – would in turn “provide an economic boost of nearly $1 trillion over ten years”. Where do you think that $1.5 Trillion will come from? That money is owed and those bad debts will have to be shouldered by somebody – ultimately the US taxpayer! You want to cancel the debts of young people who borrowed money for school so they can make MORE bad financial choices by buying a new car? Your own chart shows auto loan debt is skyrocketing …making this grow at an even faster rate seems like a GREAT idea. No one wants to talk about those of us that lived within our means and saved to go to college and graduated with NO DEBT – and helped both of my kids do the same. It can be done if you are willing to work hard and live within your income – something this article never considers. The “logic” put forth in this article (more new cars, moving up to a luxury brand, etc.) is the exact line of thinking that got us into this mess in the first place!
Excellent reply. Couldn’t have worded it better myself. Our family and my daughter have made the necessary sacrifices to avoid huge student loan debt. To forgive these debts is a very bad precedent which teaches these young people the WRONG lesson.